Breaking the cycle of children entering state care

One of the more insidious impacts of early relational/developmental trauma lies in the area of language development and, especially, inner state language. In an environment where parents are grossly preoccupied with their own challenges, opportunities for language growth are stunted. Put simply, there is not the regularity of sensitive back and forth interactions between parent and child, where the child tunes into what the parent is saying, and the parent is speaking the words that go with the child’s experience, such that in time they will become the child’s own words. The parent may not even have the words, themselves, to put to the child’s experience, as a consequency of their own history of early relational/developmental trauma.

In the absense of a sophisticated inner state language, the child is unable to articulate about their experience, just as the parent is unable to articulate their own experience and that of the child in a sophisticated way. Language expression is limited to simple dichotomies, such as “good” or “bad”, or “happy” or “angry/sad”.

In turn, in the absense of sophisticated language, the child can only internalise whether they have been “good” or “bad”, or are “happy” or “angry/sad”. The parent can only use these concepts when referring to the child.

Children and young people who struggle to articulate about their experience rely overly on primitive gestures to communicate about their experience and get their needs met. The most primitive are crying and the social smile. They become alternately charming and demonstrative.

Unfortunately, as they progress through childhood, these primitive relational behaviours are inadequate to fully communicate about their experience and secure needs provision. Adults may frequently misunderstand the intent of the child, such that they inadvertently confirm the negative, about themself (“I am bad”) and others (“you are mean”).

These, then, become central components of the child’s inner voice, and influence how the child approaches life and relationships, right into adulthood.

The sad reality is that the parent and child both struggle to articulate themselves effectively, resulting in maladaptive behaviours that have negative impacts for them both.

If we are to break the cycle of children in care growing into adults with children in care, we need to focus therapeutic endeavours on language development (and the motivation to express oneself in words) as much as anything else.

Unknown's avatar

About colbypearce

I am a practising Clinical Psychologist with twenty-seven years’ experience working with children and young people recovering from abuse and neglect. I am also an author and educator in trauma-informed, therapeutic caregiving. My programs are implemented in Australia and Ireland, and I am well-known for my practical and accessible guidance for caregivers and professionals alike.
This entry was posted in trauma informed and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Breaking the cycle of children entering state care

  1. Roussos, Rachel (DCP)'s avatar Roussos, Rachel (DCP) says:

    UNOFFICIAL

    This was very interesting, thanks Colby

    Rachel

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.